{ "objects" : [ { "embark_ID" : 5133, "URL" : "https://webkiosk.gallerysystems.com/Objects-1/info/5133", "Disp_Access_No" : "1944.D1.210.8", "_AccNumSort1" : "", "Disp_Create_DT" : "late 15th century - early 16th century", "_Disp_Start_Dat" : "1467", "_Disp_End_Date" : "1532", "Disp_Title" : "The Deposition of Christ", "Alt_Title" : "", "Obj_Title" : "The Deposition of Christ", "Series_Title" : "The Large Passion", "Disp_Maker_1" : "Albrecht Dürer", "Sort_Artist" : "Dürer, Albrecht", "Disp_Dimen" : "", "Disp_Height" : "", "Disp_Width" : "", "Dimen_Extent" : "", "Medium" : "Woodcut", "Support" : "", "Disp_Medium" : "Woodcut", "Info_Page_Comm" : "", "Dedication" : "Gift of George W. Davison (BA Wesleyan 1892), 1944", "Copyright_Type" : "Open", "Disp_Obj_Type" : "print", "Creation_Place2" : "", "Department" : "", "Obj_Name" : "", "Period" : "", "Style" : "", "Edition" : "", "Curator" : "Compared with the set owned by Laube, the DAC set is slightly later, with more wormholes in blocks and some breakdown of inking in areas of narrow lines. DAC paper is also very white in comparison to warmer tones of the Laube set. Could the DAC set have been bleached prior to 1944? Otherwise DAC has a good set of impressions--some (e.g., Ecce Homo) better than the Laube, others not quite as crisp. (Clare Rogan, 9/13/2006)", "Images": [ { "ImagePath" : "https://webkiosk.gallerysystems.com/Media/images/DAC_1944-D1-210-8_001_use.jpg", "ThumbnailPath" : "https://webkiosk.gallerysystems.com/Media/Thumbnails/DAC_1944-D1-210-8_001_use.jpg", "PreviewPath" : "https://webkiosk.gallerysystems.com/Media/Previews/DAC_1944-D1-210-8_001_use.jpg", "IIIF_URL": "http://iiif.gallerysystems.com/DAC_1944-D1-210-8_001_use.jpg", "IsPrimary" : "1", "_SurrogateID" : "3333", "Image_Type" : "", "Photo_Credit" : "", "Remarks" : "", "View" : "" } , ] }, ] }